Campbell nairne на одну ступень выше

Dating > Campbell nairne на одну ступень выше

Download links: → Campbell nairne на одну ступень выше → Campbell nairne на одну ступень выше

It might be worth checking your computer for viruses with an antivirus utility such as from «Dr. Работала экономистом, бухгалтером, продавцом и др. Картина состоит из тридцати двух полотен, 51 см высотой и 41 см шириной, на каждой из которых изображена банка супа компании , при этом все консервированные банки разных сортов, предложенных компанией в своё время.

His words were interrupted by a strange noise coming from the next room. At this moment, it becomes clear that Rosa agreed to go to the cinema with Andrew because of boredom and desire to be seen in the dress circle, even with Andrew. The main idea of the story is that sometimes people cannot be honest with each other, because of the different factors. I won't hear it again! He said they would marry the day they found the perfect house for both of them, however, Roger rejected all the orders of the agents offering a new house. What do they call this type of composition the end returning the reader to the place and time indi cated in the beginning? Abstract art, Art, Color 1088 Words 4 Pages Lord of the Flies Analysis of chapter One Lord of the Flies by William Golding is recognized as a literary masterpiece. And like a gentlemen, Roger wish her happiness. Swiftly the light dimmed again. The text can be divided into several parts: exposition, complication, climax and denouement. Campbell Soup Company has continued to grow and flourish throughout... Препод не знает, что в балансе основные средства идут по остаточной стоимости.

Adolphus Busch, Anheuser-Busch, Eberhard Anheuser 1703 Words 7 Pages heroes have been told, written, and passed down since the beginning of time; each unique but following a tight pattern. Consult a dictionary, transcribe the following words and practise their pronunciation: Bewildered a Explain: vital жизненно важными facts about Home Rails, Questi 7.

Анализ “One Stair Up” by Campbell Nairne - What a baby he is, Rosa was thinking.

The text is written in very light and humorous way. The main character is Roger Charing. And we refer to him as to the protagonist of the story, because by the way of narration of his friend, Roger from the beginning of the story appears the center of attention. The main idea of the story is that sometimes people cannot be honest with each other, because of the different factors. He was among the most popular writers of his era and reputedly the highest paid author during the 1930s. «The Escape» is a short story of the socio-psychological type. Stories of this type are common for S. Maugham, who depicts society through feelings and relationships of his characters. To stress this fact, the exact time and place of action are not indicated in the story, which gives it the impression of situation, that can happen at any time in any place. The main characters of the text are the narrator, Roger Charing and Ruth Barlow. In the first person narration the narrator tells us the story of one of his friend. The plot of the story is quite common, but interesting. They were very happy and were going to marry. Then suddenly Roger fell out of love with Ruth. But he found a way to make Ruth release him. He said they would marry the day they found the perfect house for both of them, however, Roger rejected all the orders of the agents offering a new house. At last Ruth lost her temper, left Roger and married another man. With ironic air the author introduces Roger Charing. He is not at all young, and on most occasions careful with the opposite sex. But, meeting Ruth Barlow, he completely loses his head. His name was Roger Charing. He was no longer young when he fell in love with Ruth Barlow and he had had sufficient experience to make him careful; but Ruth Barlow had a gift or should I call it a quality? He went down like a row of ninepins. Why would a wise and sensible man suddenly fall for woman's charm so mindlessly? Barlow is a person who knows how to wring heart strings for her own advantage. The author gives us direct method of characterization of Mrs Barlow. She was unfortunate person. But all those stylistic devices suggest are hyperbolized and the author uses them to make a humorous effect. And this humorous effect suggests to my mind that everything is not so sweet and sincere in this story. Further the narrator told that Ruth was scheming and she was as hard as nails. And this simile describes her in a right way, using it the author wanted to say that this women will take what she wants. He was a famous English novelist, playwright and short-story writer of the end of the nineteenth and of the twentieth centuries. Maugham wants the readers to draw their own conclusion about the characters and events described in his novels. The text under analysis is the story about women and men who has an unclear, complicated relationship. The plot of the story is quite interesting and exciting. «The escape» told by the first narration, the author tells us about his friend. The main characters of the story are Roger Charing and Ruth Barlaw. During the text we can see their infelicitous and quite strange relationship. From the very beginning the narrator convinces us that if a woman once made her mind to marry a man nothing but instant flight could save him. Also the author describes the main characters, especially he emphasize Ruth. She was twice a widow and the narrator gives us to readers to make understand that Ruth is poor, defenseless, but at the same time the narrator describes her as a strong women. At the beginning of the text we see how they are happy; Roger care for Ruth, gives to her some jewelry etc. By the way, he was rich. So, we can see the people, Roger and Ruth as the future family, and this is idea of this portion of the story. The narrator describes the first part of their relations which were rather standard. As all people they met, fell in love and decided to be together. But, suddenly, one of them, its Roger, fell out of love. And it was the next part of their relations. He became acutely conscious that Ruth had a mind to marry him. Roger gave a solemn oath that nothing could include him to marry Ruth. The epithets «acutely conscious», «solemn oath» stress the importance, significance of his decisions. So, who is to blame that Roger fall out of love? But probably if she loved him in real, they can be together for whole life. Roger kept his own counsel, he remained attentive to all her wishes. It was decided that they would be married as soon as they found a suitable house. It was very hard to find a satisfactory one. At the end of the story, the author shows us the letters, which were send by Ruth. Having read the letters we see that Ruth is finally going to get married. And like a gentlemen, Roger wish her happiness. So, I think that Roger is just coward. Why I think so? He had to admit to Ruth that he fall out of love. Instead, he waited for all collapse. Initially, the relationship between Roger and Ruth were not real, not sincere, infelicitous and complicated. Of course, in real life we have the same. The author has revealed this problem. In my point of view, this short story written by Somerset Maugham is quite interesting and true to life. Also the author makes us the readers to understand the situation of the text. The great advantage of this novel is that it shows the life with great realism, fine style and good sense of humor. The extract under analysis tells of the 2 people in love, where the man is in love but the woman is not. The action takes place in the luxury cinema theatre. The main characters are 2 youngsters - Andrew and Rosa. They went to the cinema. The author describes in details the whole luxury the hall of cinema. We can see their relationships in the cinema center where they went, through Andrews thoughts about Rosas feelings, he was worried about will Rosa like this movie or not, despite that in the end Rosa disliked the film but Andrew liked. Outcome was different tastes, both of them has different feelings, attitude to things and different word vision. I think the main theme is nonreciprocal relationships between 2 youngsters, where Rosa uses young, childish, harmless, poor Andrew to go one stair up to better life or in less to see luxury life. The extract can be divided into 5 parts: 1- Rosa and Andrew coming to the cinema and description of a cinema luxury, 2- Andrews inner monologue, 3- description beginning of the film and preparing to the film, 4- description of the film, 5- viewpoint of Rosa. In this scene we can see how different Rosa and Andrew are. Andrew supposed some comedy, not a big film. And all the fun was when somebody appeared in any foolish situation, for example, had an egg broken on his head or was all covered with custards. Andrew really enjoyed this comedy, but Rosa was very unsatisfied. In order not to hurt Andrew she just said that she had another sense of humor. I think, in this text author uses short sentences, including in dialogues, also we can see grotesque which lead to irony, humor of words and repetitions «seems to…». The author uses different stylistic devices. Such as different epithets: «shadowy faces», «looped curtain», «hardest hearts», «rapid-fire drama», «hot darkness», «a trim girl», «a heart searing tale», «big hulking kid». Epithets make the speech more artistic and interesting; what is more, they help the reader to imagine everything in details. Also there are similes: «the carpet yielded like springing turf», «a hard-worked dog, for you saw it, or another like it, in dozens of these comic films». Metaphors: «a shower of stars, a shaft of white light», «dim region of luxury», «thrill-thirsty young blood». And here also we come across colloquialisms «Gee baby, you are a swell kid», «cos», «hulking», «och». I think it was made to characterize the personages, their low class of people. It drew tears from the hardest hearts. It is described even with some kind of sarcasm as a sample of bad taste. Overall, I liked this extract, for me it was interesting, if there were given the opportunity I would like to read the entire book. First paragraph depicts us location were action takes place. In the first part of the story we can see that their relationships are not as good as they seem to be. Also story includes descriptions of movie trailer and big picture. This story shows a pretty life-like situation, it can happen with anyone anywhere. Action takes place in cinema theater, most likely in Britain. Main characters of the story are Andrew and Rosa, couple that went there to watch movies. As I already said, in the very beginning we can notice that they seem to be having been seeing each other for not so long. Author describes them in an indirect way of characterization, giving to readers an opportunity to make our own conclusion about characters and their actions. We can divide this text on three parts — exposition, complication and climax. As I already mention this text is just a fragment so there is no denouement. Exposition — the very first paragraph recital of cinema and how Andrew and Rosa came there. Complication - second paragraph and including conversation of Andrew and Rosa about movie. Maybe if we had complete story we would divide it differently. It is pretty bad that we do not know full exposition and true end of the story. Language of the author is very rich but simple at the same time. Text is full of various stylistic devices especially in parts about trailer and movie but still understandable. All of these devices combined give us grotesque and irony. In conclusion I would like to say that I liked this story more than previous ones. I pity Andrew he have been trying hard for Rosa. And at first she seems to be cold and selfish but I can understand her too. The given extract is a description of the attendance of the cinema by two youngsters Rosa and Andrew. They are representatives of the working class? And they have different aims of visiting cinema that was the reason of developing of the conflict between them. The theme of this extract is the problem of misunderstanding between Rosa and Andrew. The main idea is a different attitude to things, different word vision and different motivation. The story is told by the third person narration, but also we can find the first person narration. The language of the extract is rather simple, the author used a lot of compound sentences and a lot of colloquial words that help the reader to feel the atmosphere in the cinema and the thoughts and inner condition of the main heroes. The plot structure of the extract is closed, because there are all elements. The exposition when the heroes come to the cinema, and their first impression from the atmosphere of the luxury. The most tense moment we can see when Andrew captures by the emotions, tries to share his impressions with Rosa but she is irritated by him, and she does not want to understand him. The denouement of the story is the ferine answer of Rosa. In the language of main character we can find simple sentences, this colloquial language is an evidence of the low education level of the heroes. We should pay attention on the title of the story. It helps us to understand the reason of the conflict between Rosa and Andrew. It tells us what people have the different aims in their life, not only to reach success in some activity or to develop yourself and be ahead of the rest or one stair up but also respect other people. He described the life of a working-class family from Edinburgh. And is characterized by realism, a fine style and a sense of humour. This text about two young people Andrew and Rosa, they decided to watch some film. Andrew thought that film is great comedy and very fun. Andrew really enjoyed this comedy, but Rosa does not like it. Andrew did not understood why, and Rosa said that they have another sense of humour. The author show us difference a sense of humour of this people. This part show us, how different Rosa and Andrew are. We can think that Rosa does not like some comedy, may be she likes other genres or may be she does not perceive him in seriousness. The author used different stylistic devices and using them he described heroes, film, emotions, it help for reader imagine to details. The important thing I this text, it is irony and parody. As for me, I like this story, it is interesting. The author show us, two opposite points of view, how different Andrew and Rosa are. I feel pity to Andrew. Is he really so stupid, she wondered. I think, she is not right. She would not say like that. The text under consideration is a fragment from book by Campbell Nairne One stair up 1932. Campbell Narine, a Scottish novelist. Aside from One stair up, he wrote a book,which is called Story Ground 1934. One stair up deals with the life of an Edinburgh working-class family and is characterized by realism, a fine style and a sense of humour. The plot of the story is concerned with the visiting to the Broadway cinema of young people. Their names are Andrew and Rosa. Events of the story described in the third person. We can hear the thoughts of the main characters. In addition, along with the characters we feel their surroundings. We can say that the reader is going through events with Andrew and Rosa. Reading the fragment of the book, each time we realize that only Andrew like the film. Moreover, he gets the pleasure of watching a movie and that is why he laughing loudly. Unlike Rose, who in turn does not understand Andrew. He begins to annoy Rosa. Together with a description of the way Andrew sees the film and its characters, Rosa's feelings, the narrator makes the reader laugh. There is a certain proportion of sarcasm in the text. For Andrew this movie is rather just a comedy, which he can laugh heartily. For instance: He had now a pleasant feeling that he was going to enjoy himself. There was some rare fun in this picture. That fat man with the beard you had to laugh! First of all you saw a shelf with a basket of eggs on it.. The text can be divided into four parts: going to the cinema, then sitting in the circle, watching the film and final part, when Rose says what she thinks about the movie: I don't see anything funny in that. Complication begins with the Rosa's question: This is a comedy?. The author reveals the nature of characters through action items, dialogues, their thoughts. The narrator uses internal monologues to show the thinking of both characters. The author uses different stylistic devices, epithets such as: shadowy faces , looped curtain, hardest hearts. Epithets make the speech more interesting. Also there are similes: yielded like springing turf , a hard-worked dog, for you saw it, or another like it, in dozens of these comic films. The main device that the author uses is irony and parody, when the author describes the announcement of the Mothers of Broadway movie. No doubt, the story is very interesting and the way the author describes it. Reading the text, it seems to us that the events occur in our minds realistic. We are such these characters see and feel everything as Andrew and Rosa. We have access to their thoughts and judgments. Such situations in this story we can find in our life. This is quite natural. Because there are many and many people in the world. And they are all different. People are not the same in everything with each other. Therefore, the main idea of the story is that, for somebody something may be normal, as totally unacceptable to others. So, in the end of the story we can see how different Rosa and Andrew are. It was written in 1932. But it looks like only at first sight. Actually, it is story about the wrong choice of partner, misalliance and about feelings. We see one-evening story, Rosa and Andrew went to the cinema, where she realized how different they are— Rosa and Andrew. It takes one paragraph and it is exposition. Author gave us a detailed description of theatre, to make feel readers a solemn atmosphere. Being plunged in this atmosphere, we see how irrelevant and ridiculous Andrew is. Also we notice that Rosa is a little bored. She looked round to try find some of her acquaintances. At this moment, it becomes clear that Rosa agreed to go to the cinema with Andrew because of boredom and desire to be seen in the dress circle, even with Andrew. Complication starts with the second paragraph. Andrew said something about film. Further author gave us a description of their typical film watching -time. Andrew always irritates Rosa with his remarks. Rosa thinks whether her man is so stupid or not? Crisis is their dialogue in the end of story, when Rosa said that she has not his sense of humour. There are no falling actions and resolution in the text. Probably, a reason of it is that fact that this text is a fragment of the story. Both main characters are round, readers can not judge them because of lack of information. Author did not give us any background; moreover, Campbell did not show his attitude to Andrew and Rosa. He used two methods of characterization: through the dialogue and through actions. Readers see lively, simple- minded Andrew and bored, arrogant Rosa. There was the fat man with a black eye, no beard, half a collar, and no trousers. Oh, this was good! You can't really be angry with him. He doesn't seem to have grown up at all. Talk about Peter Pan. Faintly contemptuous, she watched his blunt nose and chin silhouetted in the darkness. Is he really so stupid, she wondered. Yes, I suppose he is. Oh, for heaven's sake stop that cackling! Language of the story is simple, but has that degree of easiness, which makes text light and easy-to-read and saves a richness of literal language at the same time. Text is full of stylistic devices, particularly, epithets: his blunt nose and chin silhouetted in the darkness; It was a rapid-fire drama. It was a heart-searing tale of studio parties, million-dollar prize fights, and supercharged automobiles. It drew tears from the hardest hearts. It sent thrills down the spine. It was a rapid-fire drama. It was a heart-searing tale of studio parties, million-dollar prize fights, and supercharged automobiles. It is written by a Scottish novelist Campbell Nairne in 1932 and describes the life of Edinburgh working-class. The extract depicts one night from the life of two young people, Andrew and Rosa. The action takes place in one of the Broadway cinemas. While Andrew really enjoys the movie and the jokes, Rosa sits unsatisfied. She does not like him and everything around. Relationship between a girl and a boy as a symbols of the young generation is the theme of the story. The text is really interesting from the point of view of narratology. First, it seems that there is only a third person narration. However, if we analyze the lexis of the passages, it becomes clear that we are dealing with heterodiegetic narrator who is reproducing the impressions of Rosa and Andrew in an internal focalization. The term heterodiegetic narrator was suggested by a French literary theorist Gerard Genette. The heterodiegetic narrator is omnipresent and almighty. However, we can find it out by analyzing the speech. It drew tears from the hardest hearts. It sent thrills down the spine. It was a rapid-fire drama. The purpose of the humour is to characterize Andrew as an average movie-goer and expose the social problems in the contemporary culture. However, most of the time Andrew is a focalizer. Yes, I suppose he is. To my mind the theme of the story is hidden under the surface. And in order to get to it you are suppose to know the background of the story, all the peculiarities of the relationship of the characters. But for now we can only give guesses. I think this story is just about the fact that all people are different. The plot is about two teenagers who went to see a movie. Through the story, we notice that they have nothing in common. Like two movies, the big picture and the ad movie, they were so different from each other. The time is the first half of the 20th century, the place is Great Britain. In the story there is a combination of external and internal conflicts. The external conflict is between a boy and a girl. We should take a notice on the fact that nothing changes through the story. At the end of the story the boy is still very delicate about the girl, as in the beginning; and the girl does feel the same indifference and negligence towards the boy, as in the beginning of the text. The text can be divided into several parts: exposition, complication, climax and denouement. There are two main characters in the text: Andrew and Rosa. They are both flat characters, there are no story behind them in the text. We can see the stylistic parallel in the text, the comparison Andrew and Rosa, and the comparison of the movies. Rosa reminds me of the ad picture, because the ad picture had the plot, emotions, things to think after, etc. The big picture was funny and entertaining, yet seemed a bit shallow and pathetic. In my opinion those two movies are not bad or good, they are just different in genre, and orientated to the different audiences. And Andrew is a little childlike, yet honest and sweet. The story is narrated by 3rd person. In the story there are also several colloquial expressions. I think the author put them in the text intentionally, in order to give the readers the hint that the characters are teenagers, and to single out the fact that the characters are different from each other, because in addition to the colloquialisms there are several bookish expressions. The great advantage of this novel is that it shows the life with great realism, fine style and good sense of humor. The text took place in cinema, maybe in 1930-s, in Edinburgh. Two young people — Andrew and Rosa — came to watch a movie. During the film we could see their attitude to each other, and what kind of relations they had had. Andrew and Rosa are both from the working-class of Edinburgh, and, I think, it was their maybe first date in cinema at all. So, the author compares the theatre with something very luxury and unusual. Because of that, she tries to find familiar faces. What about Andrew, so, he just tried to impress her companion, he likes Rosa. Also, he prefers not to see anybody else in theatre unlike her. They had big difference. I think we can divide this text into four parts: 1 Coming to the cinema; 2 Andrew and Rosa sitting in the circle before the comedy their dialogue ; 3 The film itself; 4 The final part, when Rosa says her opinion about the movie. The climax of the text, in my opinion, is the moment when Rosa said her attitude to the film. So there we can see a big difference between these two characters. The text is quite problematic for understanding and translating, because the author used a lot of epithets rapid-fire drama, hot darkness, shadowy faces, looped curtain, hardest hearts , metaphors a shower of stars, a shaft of white light , metonymy young blood , and simile a carpet that yielded like, a hard-worked dog, for you saw it, or another like it, in dozens of these comic films. But, we can see in the text, a big difference in their behavior. Rosa tries to be noticed in circle, Andrew — not. So, the question — who is pitiful — Rosa, who wants better life, or Andrew, who already reconcile with it — is controversial.